Twilight Zone – A Message from Charity (11/01/85)

tzmessagecharity1There are multiple reasons for me to not like this.  1) After getting off easy with a 10-minute segment yesterday, I’m left with a 37-minute chore. 2) It stars an uninteresting actor from a so-so Star Trek series . . . as a kid. 3) It is the kindler / gentler Twilight Zone as seen in If She Dies and Ye Gods.  And yet . . .

In 1700, Farmer Hoggett is worried about his daughter Charity who is sick with fever.  The doctor in this small Pilgrim community seems to double as the veterinarian.  Hoggett says, “Master Towbridge is more experienced at delivering lambs and foals than treating human maladies.”

In her fever, Charity hears the roar of some great beast which turns out to be a car — even worse, it is a car on a TV.  In the present, teenager Peter Wood [1] is also laid up with a fever, watching TV.  He is getting chilled orange juice and Advil, not so much with the bark and leaches.

He too gets a glimpse across time as he sees a pilgrim woman in his bedroom.  As the woman puts a damp cloth on Charity’s forehead, Peter feels the relief.  As Charity brushes her hand across a burlap blanket, she says it feels like a soft quilt.  There is a strange close up shot of Peter’s hand brushing over his soft quilt.  It is just a couple of seconds and too close to see the context — but was he copping a feel?

tzmessagecharity2The next day as Charity and Peter are each outdoors recuperating, they are able to communicate.  They learn that they both live close to Bear Rock near Harmon Brook in Massachusetts.  However, one lives there in a dark time when there is a dull uniformity of thought, great oppression, taxation without representation, and a ruling puritanical elite which gets the vapors if thou expresseth any perceived heresy; and Charity lives in 1700.   Heyooooo!

They are also able to see through each other’s eyes.  Peter looks at an airplane flying above to prove he is in the future.  She is still skeptical until Peter takes a drink of orange juice, now with 90% less scurvy.  He begins chowing down on all kinds of junk food to show her you how modern Americans eat.  Sadly, we do not get to see him vicariously enjoying Charity’s dinner of souse, scrapple and fetid water.

She asks him to look in a mirror so she can see what he looks like.  He asks her to look look into the brook so he can see her reflection.  It is love at second-sight.  Charity tells her friend Ursula of the miraculous things she has seen through Peter’s eyes — horseless carriages, boxes with likenesses of people many leagues [2] distant, men walking on the moon, and cheese in aerosol cans.

He shows her a library, takes a trip on an airplane, gives her a tour of Washington DC, and tells her of the Revolution (the one in her future, not the inevitable one in his future). For some reason, Peter’s father gives him a glass of wine, so Charity gets her first taste of alcohol.  Hoggett doesn’t cotton to her jocularity and thinks she is still not over her fever.  Ursula attributes Charity’s recent shenanigans to her being a witch.

tzmessagecharity5This is scientifically confirmed when one of the neighbors has a calf born with “a pinched up face and a third eye.”  Squire Hacker tells her he must search her whole teenage body for witchmarks, and “the search must be thorough for the devil’s ways are cunning.”  Charity belts him and runs as fast as her little buckled shoes will carry her.

She asks Peter to research whatever became of her.  He finds nothing about Charity being on trial for witchcraft, but does dig up some dirt on Squire Hacker.  She is able to leverage this into a not-guilty verdict. Charity ends their communication but leaves him a message which he finds 285 years later — their initials carved into a rock which miraculously is not underneath an 7-11.

For a not-your-father’s-Twilight Zone [3], this was a pretty great segment.  I completely bought into the design which felt like 1700.  The performances seemed perfectly suited to the era.  James Cromwell (Hoggett — OK, Obediah) only had a few scenes, but was convincing.  However, the episode was really carried by Kelly Noonan (Charity).  She seemed perfectly of that era in her accent and movement.  Robert Duncan McNeill (Peter) had a thankless job of having no one to play off of in almost every scene; also wearing giant 1980s glasses.  He did it about as well as possible, though.

I give it 1600 out of 1700.

Post-Post:

  • [1] The previous segment had a kid named Dickie and this one has a kid named Peter from the Wood family.  What the hell?
  • [2] I did not realize a league was a unit of distance other than under the sea.  On land, it is the distance one can walk in an hour, which seems pretty subjective for a unit of measurement.
  • [3] Although airing in 1985, maybe now it is your father’s Twilight Zone.
  • Peter and Charity were 16 and 11 in the short story.  Good move, upping her age.
  • Cromwell and McNeill went on to be big shots in the Star Trek world.  Sadly, the best of the lot, Kerry Noonan seems to have given up acting.  Maybe some scuzzy producer wanted to search her for actressmarks.
  • Classic TZ Legacy:  Michael (not J.) Fox was in 3 episodes of the 1960s series.
  • Available on YouTube.

Twilight Zone – Examination Day (11/01/85)

tzexamination1Normally I don’t write about the 10-minute segments as they are filler between two longer-form segments.  In this case it is filler for only one longer-form segment, so I feel duty-bound to post (i.e. it is a chance to quickly burn off one day’s posting requirement).

Dickie Jordan is blowing out the twelve candles on his unappetizing gray birthday cake.  He foolishly squanders his birthday wish hoping that he scores well on the government examination.

His parents tell him not to worry about it.  Dickie informs them that everyone at at school has been talking about it and saying it was easy.  Besides, he gets good marks in school.

For his birthday, Dickie is thrilled to have received an Omni-Coder which seems to be a combination TV and Telephone.  C’mon, what is this, the year 3000?

Dickie goes to the testing facility.  His parents soon get a call — Dickie’s scores have exceeded the government standard. According to to law, he will be killed!  I hope they saved the receipt for that Omni-Coder.

tzexamination2I loves me a good twist, and I hates me some big government, but this is just crap.  Nothing here makes any sense.  It is a complete fabrication to set up the utterly predictable surprise ending.

The government kills anyone with an IQ over a given figure.  OK, I accept that as a premise.  But:

  1. Eleven year old kids never wonder what happened to all the bright twelve year olds they knew?  At least Logan’s Run came up with a cover story.
  2. Why does this society bother to even have schools?
  3. Are all parents as emotionless as these two at the prospect that their kid will likely be killed?  They cringe a couple of times, but their emotions are suppressed just to enable the twist.
  4. Dickie says everyone at school thought the test was easy.  So is the government killing off 99% of the population?  That matte painting above looks pretty spacious, not exactly Soylent Cabrini-Green.
  5. Dickie says the other kids thought the test was easy.  If they are so smart, why were they back in school?  Dickie didn’t even get to go home.
  6. tzexamination3His parents seem reasonably intelligent.  Were they ever tested? [1]
  7. Dad asks if Dickie would like to watch some TV before bed.  It is good foreshadowing to have Dickie prefer to read.  But why do they have him reading a comic book?  OK, if he were reading A Brief History of Time, I guess I would have questioned why it was still in print.
  8. Word never leaks out about this test?  News of this test would spread faster than that bullshit Kobayashi Maru test.  Actually, the concepts are very similar because both scenarios require the viewers to absolutely suspend any understanding of human nature. [2]
  9. If society is a bunch of dimwits, WTF built that Omni-Coder?  Do they not do that testing in South Korea?
  10. The government wouldn’t have to do this because, as usual, the private sector is doing it better.

I get that they were going for a Harrison Bergeron thing here, but the deck was just too stacked.  Maybe I’m expecting too much from what is essentially a one-act joke.

Post-Post:

  • If Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton had taken a test like this at 12, they would have both been safe.  Trump wouldn’t have known the answers, and Hillary would have lied to every question asked including name and date.
  • [1] In the short story by Henry Slesar, the parents are kind of dim, not knowing what makes grass green or how far away the sun is.  Uh, wait, I’m not sure on those.  I’m safe
  • [2] It still bugs me that this scene was so utterly botched in an otherwise very entertaining movie (the reboot, not Wrath of Khaaaan).
  • Directed by Paul Lynch.
  • Available on YouTube.

Twilight Zone – Ye Gods (10/25/85)

Unwatchable.

The first segment of the episode, If She Dies, was sappy and maudlin and sticked the landing.  Or is it stuck?  OK, it stunk the landing — the ending was botched [1].  I rolled with it, though, because I make my own fun; I just don’t make enough for everyone. Many people seemed to hate that first segment, but the second one makes the first one easier on the eyes than a Carl’s Jr. commercial.

If you take all the awful show-biz tropes from the 80’s (plus one from the 60s) and mix them into one of the dreaded TZ humorous episodes, this is what you end up with.

The lead actor is a soulless, deal-making yuppie typical of the 1980s, although not quite the coke-snorting asshole from Die Hard.  The woman is frequently back-lit and shot through more gauze than Elly May Clampett in Eye of the Beholder.  I’m not sure if the music is purely synth, but I’m pretty sure no strings or woodwinds were injured in the making of this score.  The whole thing comes off as one of those lousy Cinemax melodramas if they tried to go for laughs instead of nudity; which might explain why they never go for laughs. There are some primitive CGI effects that were all the rage at the time, but I’m sure they will never catch on.

The performances are geared to make this a romantic comedic rom-com romp; or maybe I’ve just invented the “romp-com.”[2]  So maybe they should be graded on a curve. David Dukes is a tolerable yet exceedingly dull lead.  The performance which sinks the episode, however, comes from Robert Morse.

In the incredibly unlikely event that Bill Paxton ever took an acting class, it must have been taught by Robert Morse.  Like Paxton, he is apparently incapable of a single frame where he is not hamming it up.  You have to act in order to over-act, so I don’t think that is it.  It is just relentless mugging and unfunny funny faces.  He was never a huge star, but has been around forever.

His skills were no better 25 years later when he played Bert Cooper on Mad Men — same utter lack of characterization.  He does have a certain unique “presence” but you better like it, because that is all you are going to get.  At least age rounded some of the edges.

Actually, his role in Mad Men kind of parallels his acting.  I get that he is a senior partner at Sterling Cooper, the firm where the show begins.  But as they moved on to Sterling Cooper Draper Price and Sterling Cooper & Partners why did they keep dragging him along and putting his name on the letterhead?  Did he ever produce one worthwhile idea in the entire series?  In both worlds, why is he here? [3]

So Dukes spots a woman, and Morse — playing Cupid — sets them up.  But Dukes does not follow through.  Somehow this leads to him setting up Cupid with the former Mrs. Cupid.  At the end, Dukes and the woman and Mr. & Mrs. Cupid are happy couples. The Cupids drive by in an ancient Dusenberg and wave at Dukes.  Final question: Why would they be in a Dusenberg?  Cupid has been around for 2,000 years — why would his knowledge of cars start or stop in the 1930s?

Post-Post:

  • [1] Hmmm, I always thought “stick the landing” meant you blew it.  Turns out I had this completely wrong — even in thinking this was clever.
  • [2] It appears I did invent it.
  • [3] Equally baffling to me is Roger Sterling.  His father was one of the founders of the original firm, but has he ever generated a single fee large enough to cover his bar tab?  I think he did finally land a big one later on, but why did they keep him around all that time?
  • Directed by Peter Medak, who should know better (The Changeling, many TV shows including The Wire and Breaking Bad).
  • Available on YouTube, but why would ya?

Twilight Zone – If She Dies (10/25/85)

tzifshedies04Nine year old Cathy is making her father one of those breakfasts that only a parent would find edible.  I must admit she is pretty adorable as she presents him with a crudely wrapped birthday present — a wallet that she made.  He opens it to find a family picture of Cathy, himself and his dead wife.  For Father’s Day she got him a mug with his prostate exam results on it.  Dammit, this is not what I want from the Twilight Zone!  But it is heartbreaking.

Cathy says she wishes she was small enough to fit into her father’s pocket so she could go with him to work. [1]  I was hoping Dad would call in sick and take her to SeaWorld or something, but no — he drives her to school and she is killed.  A biker-boi comes from behind a car and in front of him.  He swerves into a parked car rather than let Darwinian evolution takes its natural course.

Dad is OK, but Cathy is in a coma and her vitals are failing.  As he is going home, he sees a little girl standing on the roof of a nearby orphanage.[2]  He runs over to the where the tzifshedies15nuns are just wrapping up a rummage sale.   A nun tells him that is impossible because all of the children have been adopted.  No wait, they just moved to a new building.  As he is leaving, he sees the girl on a swing.  She points to a large lump under a tarp.  When he looks at it, then back at the swing, she is gone.

Why do people on TV always look away from weird phenomena?  What happens to entities like this?  Do they blink out, or fade out, or shoot off like a rocket, silently explode, break down into nanites, disappear into the earth?  But I digress.

Under the tarp is a small bed.  It is almost more like a coffin with a wooden headboard and wooden sides.  Frankly, I think most kids would be scared to sleep in it, unless they were in a com . . . oh.  He hands the nun a wad of bills and takes the bed home.

tzifshedies36That night, the little girl comes walking into Dad’s bedroom.  She says she wants Toby, and that the Sisters will be mad if they find her out of bed.  She leads him back to the bed he just bought and climbs in.  She introduces herself as Sarah and asks Paul to tuck her in.  He looks away for a second — at nothing! — then back at the bed to see that she has just disappeared. Come on!

Paul goes back to the orphanage to ask about Sarah.  The nun says Sarah died of TB before he was born.  Paul asks her if she believes in ghosts, and she replies, “the Holy Ghost.”  Zing!  For some reason, she did hang on to Sarah’s tubercular Teddy Bear Toby for 40 years.  Paul asks the nun if maybe God did not take Sarah’s soul, that maybe she had something to do here.

He goes to the hospital and infuriates them by carrying Cathy home before her insurance runs out.  She is totally non-responsive as her father places her in the antique bed.  He falls asleep exhausted by her side.  The next morning as he is looking out the window, he hears Cathy’s voice, “Daddy?”

tzifshedies49He is, of course, overjoyed to see his little girl awake.  However, he is a little taken aback when she asks for Toby.  But then she smiles and nothing else matters — like, what happened to Cathy’s soul.

And if this is Sarah, then why did she call him Daddy?  Or are both of them in there together?  Or if dead Sarah’s soul could import into this body, then why not Cathy’s?  Did she die — is that what enabled the switcheroo? And why did Sarah’s soul hang around for 40 years until this particular moment?

It is a tear-jerker and not what I want out of this show, but it was well-done.

Post-Post:

  • [1] This is just begging for a Prince Charles reference, but it seems inappropriate.
  • [2] A similar unnerving shot was in It Follows of a man standing on a roof.  There is just something creepy about a person standing on a roof as anyone who has known a roofer will attest.
  • That was just gratuitous — everyone know it’s painters that you have to keep an eye on.
  • Cathy (Andrea Barber) went on to be a regular on the unwatchable [3] Full House. Unwatchable except by the people who kept it on TV for 8 years.
  • Sarah (Jenny Lewis) has had quite the career, including a series with Lucy which seems like it must have required a time machine.
  • Available on YouTube.

Twilight Zone – Nightcrawlers (10/18/85)

tznightcrawlers1I have nothing clever to say.

Which has certainly never stopped me from my obligatory daily post before.

Maybe it is the serious subject matter — a Viet Nam vet having psychological problems.

Or maybe just because it is just a really fine episode.

Sadly it does not seem to be on YouTube or Hulu.  Wherever you happen to find it, it is well-worth a watch.  Some places cite it as the best segment of the series and I can believe that.  [UPDATE — YouTube link in Comments]

Post-Post:

  • The original short story by Robert McCammon is followed almost exactly.  The only significant difference is a visit from a couple of Men in Black at the end of the print version.
  • And whatever happened to that hot agent at the end of MIB?  That’s the sequel I wanted to see.

tznightcrawlers4